Archive for the 'Music' Category

January 3rd 2009

Finding new music

Twice in the week surrounding Christmas I had people ask me, in slightly exasperated tones, where I find new music. To me, this is a very confusing question. Where could I go where I wouldn’t find new music? Favorite TV shows frequently feature good music, and movies always have soundtracks. Books reference music. There are weird little places called where anyone can go and purchase music. I think they’ve been called record stores. These stores even often showcase new, interesting music and the best ones have staff members who are willing to have a conversation with you, the potential customer and potential new fan, about bands.

Snark aside, I often forget that information (and avenues for getting information) I take for granted might not be disseminated, so both to get the information organized for myself and to further spread the information, an unordered list.

  • allmusic - seemingly the go to site for basic music information and reviews. A fantastic starting point.

  • 75orless - Reviews of indie music done in 75 words or less. Utility is reviewer specific and I’m normally looking for some keywords to see if more investigation is warranted.
  • eMusic - the 90 song subscription I have means that I’ll always have new music around and their indie specialty means that a lot of it will be stuff that the world at large hasn’t heard yet.
  • Pandora - really good Internet radio
  • KEXP - a very good radio station out of Seattle that streams and has various podcasts. I don’t listen to them as much as I used to, but they’re a great resource for finding new stuff
  • Last.fm - a good mashup of music and social networking. What artist pages on Myspace would look like if they were on Facebook
  • Under The Radar - Their rating system is too vague, so like 75orless, I keyword search more than anything as I read through. I used to like picking up issues of Paste, but they diversified too much for me with their slim issue size.
  • Friends. The best resource possible

No Comments yet »

December 21st 2008

Attention Music Genre Taggers

I know there are a lot of music genres, like latvian nasal chanting, punk-cabaret, and cookie monster metal, so I get that some disagreement of where a particular album might best be categorized. Edge cases are, by definition, hard to slot into specific categories.

“Rock” is a pretty broad genre, probably used by the more hierarchally obsessed as a catch-all for works that bend/cross genre. It is not a genre that really fits with If You’re Feeling Sinister era Belle and Sebastian*, and (I’m looking directly at you for this one, eMusic) not at all a genre for Pelle Carlberg’s The Lilac Time, which I mistake for light Belle and Sebastian when I’m not paying attention. Is it because he says “fuck” and “shite” in songs? Can pop** musicians not swear? Or write songs about being more sad that a rhinoceros died than a grandmother?

______
* Somehow that album, too, is tagged rock.
** I differentiate strongly between rock and pop. These are different genres, people.

No Comments yet »

December 11th 2008

This Charming Band

Internets, I see that this now exists, which along with this thread at Whatever rekindles my thought that I’m probably Missing Something with my lack of knowledge about The Smiths. I like “How Soon Is Now?” in a more-than-generic* way, but other than that their Singles album hasn’t made a dent in my music appreciation.

Am I actually Missing Something, dearest Internets? Should I take efforts to rectify this situation?

_____
* (to better define liking something in a more-than-genereic way by way of an example: I like the band Headlights when their music is playing, but I forget about them when it’s not.

No Comments yet »

December 3rd 2008

The almost perfect songs

I have conversations at work that reveal how much an pop music nerd I am by me waxing near-rhapsodic about songs I’ve thought way, way too much about. Some of those conversations are about perfect pop songs (April Comes She Will, There She Goes, Between The Lines, Photographs and Tickets), but the more interesting conversations are about the songs that are nearly perfect.

The Murmurs’ “Country Song” is my standard example of a nearly perfect song. It’s short, although it’s not 2:42, it’s sweet and a bit sad, and has a clear lyrical direction. That a bit of pedal steel is under it all just makes it better for me. It does, though, have two serious missteps that keep it from being perfect. The lyric and delivery of “I know you think I’m such a fabulous person” don’t really fit, and while the song takes a bit of time to note that with “but that’s not the point,” the sardonic digression pulls me out of the song. The other mistake is in the lines “You drive too fast for not checking your mirrors/I’m still on the fly that you’ll get it together/but when’s the last time you checked your mirrors/I hope for you sake your vision is clearer.” The second half? Awesome, doubly so for making me not care the slightest about the slant rhyme. The first line’s nice, and would be pretty good alone, but was there no other option for the first two lines?

I digress.

I have another good option for an almost perfect song, the version of “1940″ from the You, Me & the Bourgeoisie single by The Submarines. They’ve taken out most of the computer effects and simplified the sound of the first half. It’s more naturally eerie, the strings are beautiful and the piano that replaces the xylophone is perfect. At 1:20, a couple more instruments get added in for a bit of a prelude and while I’d prefer something a little subtler, I’m okay with it. At 1:46, though, the whole thing swells up like a wasp sting, complete with an Of Montreal style sound. I had been so ready to declare this the definitive version, clearly superior to the version off the album (which I dearly love. It’s my favorite song off their second disc), but this comes close to ruining it. The song had been is so close to perfection.

No Comments yet »

November 23rd 2008

Calexico @ Metro

When I wrote this, I’d intended on editing it later. I’ve now decided not to bother, except to add names and links where appropriate. Y’alls get to deal with some mixed metaphors, although hopefully I don’t have any within the same sentence.

This might be the most singularly unhelpful concert review in the history of the genre, but I’m at a coffee shop at Clark and Belmont (yes, I dared) and the next train home isn’t for hours. The opening band, The Acorn, did a nice job, and any band that brings two mandolins (I thought they were ukulele’s, but Joey Burns claimed they were mandolins) on stage instantly earns bonus points. Of the six musicians on stage three were interesting to watch: the lead singer, lead guitarist and the drummer with the smaller kit. It’s too bad the only one of them I could get a good view of was the singer, as his playing parts were the least demanding. The drummer was the epitome of “more with less” and he had a wonderful sense of where and how sounds came from his kit. His hits were a lot more fluid and fun than those of his counterpart. The lead guitarist might have been overshadowed in a more accomplished band (this sounds a bit backhanded, I know. It’s not meant that way), at least until he he kept his guitar on and slung a mandolin over the top of it and played both during the song. Awesome. When their set was over, I leaned over to Laura, pointed at those three and said “they’d make a great trio.” If they’re on eMusic (they are!), I’ll probably check them out (I did!) to see if in the studio they make more use of dual percussionists (dueling ones, perhaps?). They were good, but needed more layers or complexity to their compositions to make six people on stage useful.

Going into the show all I knew of Calexico was that “Two Silver Trees” pretty good (thanks to KEXP’s song of the day podcast) and that a person I think is pretty great, and not just in musical taste, thinks they’re pretty darn super keen. Wowsers. And stuff. As the band set up their own gear, Laura named them and ran down what instruments they’d be playing. She was a little excited.

This is where I become spectacularly useless (I know, I know), because while the show ended a bit over an hour ago (no longer true!), my lack of band knowledge gives me nothing to build remembrance on. Normally, I don’t have this much trouble with new acts I like. I remember a lot from the first time I saw Andrew Bird, The Dears, or Devotchka and none of them are particularly simple, musically. Calexico, I think, moved a little more with theirs, and I’m a different audience member than I was for the other three.

I’ll expand on the second of those first. When Ryan and I saw The Dears, I was blown away, but looking back on it I was listening to their music as a whole construct (well, except for the keyboardist that reminded me of the girl I had a crush on at the time). They were heavy, bombastic, theatrical and very focused in their presentation of sound, not limited, but aware of making one thing sonically. Devotchka, too, had a very singular focus and their surprises were in choices of instruments, not arrangements. And Andrew Bird, however complex his arrangements, was only one guy with a loop machine. It’s loads of fun watching him build sounds into songs, but you’re aware of each layer as he puts it down.

The change that drives my listening is in how aware and interested I am in each individual musicians addition to the whole, and the techniques, where I can follow them, used. I’m not just watching the attitudes of the players as I’m adrift on the sound waves, I’m watching fingers move along frets and strings, noting the drummer’s technique and generally trying to anticipate what might be coming. With Calexico tonight, I spent some time in all the sound, but I was mostly chasing eddies to see how they’d formed, where they’d go, when they’d submerge and then return. I could spend so much time just trying to remember textures; I certainly spent enough saying “oooh! I like that sound.” A fer instance: I love pedal steel, but often ti’s too loud in the mix or used over much. Tonight, it was uniformly great because of the diversity of the sounds and volumes coming from it. It wasn’t just one sad, long sound sliding up and down the scale, it was loud and soft, smooth and rough. It always had a place, but that place changed in each song. I love the pedal steel a little more, now.

The entire show was like that. Parts changed, instruments changed, focus changed, language changed. I couldn’t keep up with it all, but I kept trying. It was engrossing, and I paid scant attention to the lyrics. And so I’m left with little threads that I followed well, that I’ll not be able to weave together into a whole cloth. I’m fine with that. Eventually I’ll tie the threads to something else and they’ll dangle, colorful, elusive, delightful.

1 Comment »

November 12th 2008

After many hours of listening, I’ve come to the conclusion that The Mendoza Line are a vastly unappreciated band. I give you, from last.fm, song links:

I do admit to a bit of an artist crush on Shannon McArdle.

No Comments yet »

November 2nd 2008

Indulge me, if you will

These five songs have been knocking about in my head for over a week. I think they’re jockeying for position in a narrowly defined mix, but I’m not sure if what I’m hearing is the result of long exposure to the songs or an actual link between them. If any of y’all would care to take the time to listen to them and see if you can answer the question of “do you hear what I hear?” I’d be much obliged. I don’t know if I should hint at what I’m thinking about, so I’ll put that at the bottom.

Devotchka - How It Ends:

Placebo - Follow the Cops Back Home:

Dawn Landes - Suspicion:

Wilco - I am Trying to Break Your Heart:

The Delgados - Accused of Stealing:

To me, the rhythm section is the linking factor in them all. It really twigged for me one day when Follow was immediately followed up by How It Ends and I noticed that I got a similar feeling that the drums in each became kind of overbalanced in the songs. If they were a waiter glasses would have crashed to the floor. It’s really pronounced in How It Ends, that constant feeling of reeling about, never getting a sure footing, having everything tipple over and then repeating.

When I played the videos, I didn’t really catch it on Suspicion, but that could be a factor of missing upper registers on my computer speakers. The feeling could also come from the sparseness of the music in that song and the relative heaviness of the percussion. Her voice and the guitar are really overpowered by the drumming, and the drumming is completely accompanied by the glockenspiel/xylophone (whichever it is).

No Comments yet »

October 29th 2008

I know my current install of iTunes is pretty new, and that I didn’t bother to keep all the library information intact after my last OS reinstall, but how have I listened to “Your Little Hoodrat Friend” seven more times than I’ve listened to “Since I Came”?

“Hoodrat” is a very good rock song, possibly great, but “Since I Came” is achingly beautiful, possibly transcendent. Happily this is a situation easily rectified and all I have to do is listen to a song I love a bunch more times.

No Comments yet »

October 26th 2008

In the end it appears

I should probably write about some of the books I’ve read lately, about the intractable issue I’ve had with a concept for a mix cd I’ve had for a few weeks, how I could totally be a vegetarian if I ate only Indian food, how awesome the Orange Cat is, or something equally important, but that’s not going to happen.

Instead, I’m going to quickly note that I think I’ve found* one of the roots of my musical taste: Queen’s A Night at the Opera, and specifically “Good Company.” I love Opera for both its inherent silliness and for its breadth of musical styles. You can rock out, even prog-style, you can mist up, get a little saccharine, and just laugh all in the same record. It’s breathtaking in its range. One of the songs that my dad always kind of disliked (or at least I remember him disliking) was Good Company. I loved it as a wee lad, I love it now and I see it as a little bit of a gateway into certain bits of Americana. It’s almost certainly where I got my love of folk instruments (a love one coworker can certainly attest to: I torture her with “shh! just listen to that banjo!” *swoon*) and the strong narrative and modulating meaning of words through the song just make my heart all warm.

See, there it goes again. Warm and fuzzy. Plus, since it’s a May-sung track, I don’t feel at all overmatched if I try to sing along. I do recommend that you cover your ears if I’m in the vicinity, though.
___
* rediscovered, really

No Comments yet »

September 19th 2008

11 days and 80+ plays later, Shannon McArdle’s “Leave Me For Dead” still leaves behind a trail of awesome when it’s done playing. I just keep replaying it. And like “31 Candles,” there’s a moment when she takes a normally clean thing (soap) and makes it so, so dirty.

No Comments yet »

Next »

  • Checked out:

    The Things They Carried by Tim O'Brien

    The Time Traveler's Wife by Audrey Niffenegger
  • The Last:

    Book I read:
    Fermat's Last Theorem by Amir Aczel

    Movie I saw:
    Role Models

    Album I bought:
    Sawtooth EP by Halou
  • @Antidale @Twitter

    • The very latest: