Way back when I first posted a link to an article about vegetarians, I meant to come back to where the author notes that if you sit next to him and have a pork tenderloin, he’s not judging you for it, and neither is any other garden variety* vegetarian you meet, and that the person who’s going to give you a hassle for having some hamburger is probably a jackass in ways totally separate from vegetarianism.
This dovetails neatly into a theory that Patrick Nielsen Hayden at Making Light has that literary genres are tags, not containers.
What brought those things together again for me so late on a Friday night was this quote in a Washing Times story** about a pair of nuns recently added to a terrorist watch list:
“There is no way that we ever want to be identified as terrorists. We are nonviolent. We are faith-based,” she said.
I’m willing to accept an argument that a completely nonviolent stance precludes any ability to terrorize, but I don’t accept that faith-based is equivalent to nonviolent in that construction. Faith-based, if I may expand on PNH’s idea, is a tag that explains motivations, justifications or worldview; it isn’t container confining a person’s actions in a zone of harmlessness. I’d even argue that faith-based is too vague a tag to really have any descriptive power, but it’s late and clear thought isn’t really with me. Plus, I think that’s an argument more thought-provoking than decidable (that’s not really the word I want to use, but again, late, no clear thought).
__
*Pun intended. Sorry.
** There are larger, probably more important issues in that story, like government surveillance and the usefulness of terrorist watch lists, but I’m not even slightly prepared to write about them tonight.